<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answer This Question:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/</link>
	<description>These are the personal studies of one guy on his spiritual journey through Mormonism. Many articles, books and podcasts reviewed and reflected upon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to check that out, Brad.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to check that out, Brad.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Voltaire has a great short story called (I believe) The Good Brahmin, about this very question.  Nice discussion, though I&#039;m not sure he resolves it.  I have to read it again myself.  Never hurts to reread the master at this game we&#039;re playing.

thanks.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voltaire has a great short story called (I believe) The Good Brahmin, about this very question.  Nice discussion, though I&#8217;m not sure he resolves it.  I have to read it again myself.  Never hurts to reread the master at this game we&#8217;re playing.</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Remy</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>John Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Watt and Jeremy.  I&#039;d rather be snarky. &gt;:)

Though if I were looking at it from the pig&#039;s perspective and didn&#039;t know any better, maybe I&#039;d want to remain dumb and satisfied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Watt and Jeremy.  I&#8217;d rather be snarky. &gt;:)</p>
<p>Though if I were looking at it from the pig&#8217;s perspective and didn&#8217;t know any better, maybe I&#8217;d want to remain dumb and satisfied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HiveRadical</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>HiveRadical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>This all is dependant on what constitutes &quot;smart&quot; and &quot;dumb&quot;. Even if one&#039;s smarter than all the humans that live, have ever lived, or will ever live they would still be pitifully stupid with respect to omniscience.

I know a great number of people, many illiterate, that many would consider &#039;dumb.&#039; But ultimately the gap seperating them from the intellectual elite of this planet has more in common with the gap between a rock and a hard place than they do with gaps like the grand canyon or the distance between us and alpha centauri.

So are we talking omniscient vs. barely sentient? Or just relative to humans? Because, as I recall, if one takes the Bible at it&#039;s word, the wisest among mere mortals was one King Solomon, and judging by many assessments of his ultimate standing before God at the end of his life I&#039;d dare say he came about as close to the ultimate in &quot;smart and bitter&quot; that we could see as plausibly existing on this planet.

And if you take the route of the secular humanist or the atheist then you run into the problem of the generally agreed upon limitations in human intelligence. Even then, the logical choice--if lacking a belief in the supernatural or the probability of such--is still ultimately happiness over intelligence. Such a belief has them taking into their bodies substances that provide pleasure at a known expense to life longevity and overall health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all is dependant on what constitutes &#8220;smart&#8221; and &#8220;dumb&#8221;. Even if one&#8217;s smarter than all the humans that live, have ever lived, or will ever live they would still be pitifully stupid with respect to omniscience.</p>
<p>I know a great number of people, many illiterate, that many would consider &#8216;dumb.&#8217; But ultimately the gap seperating them from the intellectual elite of this planet has more in common with the gap between a rock and a hard place than they do with gaps like the grand canyon or the distance between us and alpha centauri.</p>
<p>So are we talking omniscient vs. barely sentient? Or just relative to humans? Because, as I recall, if one takes the Bible at it&#8217;s word, the wisest among mere mortals was one King Solomon, and judging by many assessments of his ultimate standing before God at the end of his life I&#8217;d dare say he came about as close to the ultimate in &#8220;smart and bitter&#8221; that we could see as plausibly existing on this planet.</p>
<p>And if you take the route of the secular humanist or the atheist then you run into the problem of the generally agreed upon limitations in human intelligence. Even then, the logical choice&#8211;if lacking a belief in the supernatural or the probability of such&#8211;is still ultimately happiness over intelligence. Such a belief has them taking into their bodies substances that provide pleasure at a known expense to life longevity and overall health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watt Mahoun</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Watt Mahoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Amen. Smart and bitter. This question is really like asking if you want to be human or beast, which I think is what JS Mill had in mind as opposed to implying that happy human&#039;s are pigs. We don&#039;t really have a choice about our natures, just whether we will be honest or lie about the nature of human experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. Smart and bitter. This question is really like asking if you want to be human or beast, which I think is what JS Mill had in mind as opposed to implying that happy human&#8217;s are pigs. We don&#8217;t really have a choice about our natures, just whether we will be honest or lie about the nature of human experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onedudesms.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/answer-this-question/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to agree with J.S. Mill&#039;s position on this: &quot;It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.&quot; In &quot;Utilitarianism.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to agree with J.S. Mill&#8217;s position on this: &#8220;It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.&#8221; In &#8220;Utilitarianism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
